Prevalence of Mitral Valve Prolapse: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Loading...
Contact
Check for full-text access
Issue Date
Type
Conference Proceedings
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
Introduction The prevalence of Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) varies between different populations and age groups and is poorly understood, with figures ranging from 0.6 -15%. A more precise estimate is paramount for planning echocardiography service provision. This meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of MVP in two distinct populations: general (non-syndromic) and syndromic (based on known syndrome associated with MVP). Methods A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases until July 2023 to identify studies reporting the prevalence of MVP diagnosed by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Prevalence estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random effects model. Subgroup analysis based on age group and echo diagnostic criteria were conducted. 'Leaveone- out' sensitivity analysis was also performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Syndromes assessed included Marfan's, Ehlers-Danlos and Williams-Beuren. Results 78 studies with 996,011 patients were included: 47 (n=992,944) non-syndromic and 31 (n=3067) syndromic. The pooled prevalence in the general population was 2.59% (95% CI 1.88-3.55%). When stratified by age, the prevalence in neonates was 0.48%, children 1.81%, adolescents 2.70% and adults 2.02% (figure 1). Subgroup analyses across these age groups showed a non-significant difference (p=0.81). There was, however, a significant difference when specifically comparing non-young adults to young adults (2.87% vs. 0.67, p=0.01). Diagnostic criteria strongly influenced MVP prevalence (p 2 mm (figure 2). Greater MVP prevalence was observed in patients with syndromes. Marfan's was associated with the highest prevalence at 57.16%, followed by Williams-Beuren at 18.36% and Ehlers-Danlos at 8%. The 'leave-one-out' sensitivity analysis remained consistent with the results of the main analysis. Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests: the total prevalence of MVP is 2.59% in the general population, is present across all ages, with a greater prevalence in older age and markedly increased prevalence in specific syndromes. The choice of identification technique may amplify the presence by up to a factor of 4. The observed variations underscore the importance of tailored identification strategies, supported by application of precise diagnostic criteria, to guide accurate diagnosis.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
Journal
Heart (British Cardiac Society)
