Cardiac magnetic resonance rapid longitudinal shortening metrics predict cardiovascular outcomes

No Thumbnail Available

Authors

Haney, Ail�s Ceara
Roy, Roman
Andr�, Florian
Chadalavada, Sucharitha
Aung, Nay
Frey, Norbert
Petersen, Steffen E.
Salatzki, Janek
Raisi-Estabragh, Zahra

Check for full-text access

Issue Date

2025

Type

Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived myocardial strain metrics are emerging as powerful early imaging biomarkers for the detection of cardiac dysfunction. This study utilized the UK Biobank to evaluate: (i) best practice for measurement of 'rapid longitudinal shortening', a simplified software-independent measure of longitudinal left ventricular (LV) deformation, (ii) correlation and agreement of rapid longitudinal shortening and feature tracking (FT) strain, and (iii) their respective prognostic value. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two rapid longitudinal shortening [long-axis shortening (LS), atrioventricular junction shortening (AVJS)] and three FT strain measures [global longitudinal strain (GLS); global circumferential strain; global radial strain] were derived. Correlation and agreement were assessed using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Incident events were prospectively tracked over 4.4 (3.6, 5.9) years. The association of deformation metrics with incident outcomes [heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death] was evaluated using Cox regression, adjusting for demographics, lifestyle, clinical factors, LV ejection fraction, and LV mass. The analysis included 45 844 participants (52% females, median 65 years). LS and AVJS showed moderately strong correlation and agreement with GLS. LS, AVJS, and GLS were independently associated with morbidity and mortality outcomes after adjustment. Rapid longitudinal shortening showed comparable predictive value vs. FT strain for incident cardiovascular outcomes: Hazard ratio for incident HF was 0.78 {confidence interval [CI] (0.69-0.88), 0.79 (CI 0.71-0.89), and 0.78 (CI 0.69-0.89)} for AVJS, LS, and GLS respectively. CONCLUSION: Rapid longitudinal shortening metrics are significant predictors of cardiovascular outcomes comparable to FT strain. Rapid longitudinal shortening is a simple, potentially software- and vendor-independent alternative to FT strain.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Journal

European heart journal.Cardiovascular Imaging

Volume

26

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN

Collections