Advanced Cardiogenic-shock Team versus standard care in cardiogenic SHOCK: a single centre service evaluation project
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Chandra Mohan N.
Govier M.
Johnson T.W.
Felekos I.
Richards G.
Strange J.
Dastidar A.
Sidik N.
Dorman S.
Joshi N.
Contact
Check for full-text access
Issue Date
2026
Type
Article
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries high mortality. Early revascularisation improves survival, but the effect of structured multidisciplinary care on outcomes remains underexplored. Methods and results ACT-SHOCK is a service evaluation at a UK tertiary cardiac centre. Between May 2023 and May 2024, 82 patients with AMI-related CS requiring emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were identified using protocolised physiological criteria and managed by an Advanced Cardiogenic-Shock Team (ACT). The ACT comprised interventional cardiologists, intensivists, anaesthetists, critical care staff and cardiac physiologists, coordinating PCI and ongoing care. Outcomes were compared with 83 historical controls from the year preceding ACT roll-out, who received standard care without ACT activation. Primary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included predictors of 30-day mortality. Within the ACT cohort, elevated lactate, critical care admission, invasive ventilation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage E at first medical contact predicted 1-year mortality. Adjusted analyses showed ACT management was associated with lower 1-year mortality compared with standard care (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.92; p=0.026). Although 30-day mortality was lower in the ACT group, this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.39 to 1.29; p=0.26). Escalation from coronary care to critical care during the recovery phase occurred more promptly in the ACT group (9.7% vs 2.4%, p=0.09). At 24 hours, a smaller proportion of ACT patients remained in SCAI stages D/E compared with standard care (42% vs 48%; p=0.003). Conclusions Implementation of physiological criteria to identify CS and activation of a multidisciplinary ACT in a UK tertiary centre was associated with earlier detection and improved 1-year survival in AMI-related CS. These pilot data support further study across multiple UK centres to inform national policy and standardise care pathways.Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
Journal
Open Heart
Volume
13
Issue
1