Survey of rehabilitation practices for patients undergoing lumbar surgery in the United Kingdom
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
McIlroy, Suzanne
Reddington, Michael
Bearne, Lindsay
Thurgood, Dominic
McCarter, Andrew
Check for full-text access
Issue Date
2025
Type
Article
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
PURPOSE: National guidelines recommend rehabilitation for patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery, yet current provision within the UK is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine Physiotherapy practice regarding prehabilitation, peri-operative, and post-operative rehabilitation, for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, laminectomy, and single-level fusion, within the UK. METHODS: Physiotherapists working within the UK were invited to complete a cross-sectional, descriptive online survey. Open and closed-ended questions enquired about aims, content, format, and frequency of rehabilitation. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and open-ended responses were analysed narratively. RESULTS: 360 responses were received, revealing varied practices. Routine provision of prehabilitation was low (18 %) whereas peri-operative and post-operative rehabilitation was offered more frequently (>60 %). Rehabilitation was predominantly delivered in-person, on a one-to-one basis. Prehabilitation focused on educating patients and optimising psychological and physical health, peri-operative rehabilitation focused on safe mobility, and post-operative rehabilitation on improving function. Advice and education were the most common interventions across all rehabilitation phases. Exercise prescription was frequently used within peri-operative and post-operative rehabilitation. Post-operative restrictions were advised by 62 % of respondents. The most frequently provided activity restrictions were for lifting, driving, walking, sitting, and back movement, with timeframes varying considerably. CONCLUSION: This study highlights considerable variation in access to and content of rehabilitation for patients undergoing lumbar surgery in the UK. While some variation may reflect personalised care, it also suggests uncertainty in the evidence base and inconsistent guideline use. Findings support the need for patient-centred pathways, updated UK-specific guidelines, and further research into implementation barriers, the impact of postoperative restrictions, and tailored rehabilitation interventions.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
Journal
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Volume
78