Outcomes of switching from protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in virologically suppressed adults with nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance- a phase IV randomised, open-label study (PIBIK study)
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Check for full-text access
Issue Date
2025
Type
Article
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background: There are limited data on how historical nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) other than M184V/I, affect the activity of B/F/TAF. We evaluated the outcomes of switching virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) individuals harbouring major RAMs from boosted protease inhibitor (bPI)-based therapy to B/F/TAF. Method(s): Participants had various historical genotypic patterns including M184V/I, <=2 thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs), and other NRTI RAMs (NAMs), and no integrase resistance. Baseline RAMs were explored by retrospective sequencing of cellular HIV-1 DNA. Participants were randomised (1:1) to switching to B/F/TAF either immediately or after 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants maintaining virological suppression (pure virologic response) at week-24; secondary outcomes were proportion of participants with virological suppression at week-48, pre-specified safety measures, and treatment-emergent resistance. Result(s): Historically, 21/72 (29.2%) participants had M184V/I, 5 (6.9%) M184V/I + 1 NAM, 31 (43.1%) 1 TAM +/- M184V/I +/- 1 NAM, and 15 (20.8%) 2 TAMs +/- M184V/I +/- 1 NAM. At week-24, proportions maintaining virological suppression were 33/33 (100%) on B/F/TAF vs. 38/39 (97.4%) on bPI (difference 2.6%; 95% CI -2.4%, 7.5%). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 10/33 (30.3%) vs. 1/39 (2.6%), respectively. The immediate switch arm had improved lipid parameters but increased HbA1c and weight. Virological suppression was maintained at week-48. There were six discontinuations; four on B/F/TAF were drug-related and the two on bPI were not drug-related. Conclusion(s): Historical NRTI resistance did not compromise the effectiveness of B/F/TAF in virologically suppressed adults. 12% experienced treatment-limiting AEs after switching. Registration: EudraCT no: 2018-004732-30 Copyright © The Author(s) 2025.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
Journal
Virology Journal
Volume
22
Issue
1